• Print Page

Superior Court Amends Rule of Civil Procedure 73

June 02, 2025

On May 30 the District of Columbia Superior Court issued Promulgation Order 25-02 amending Superior Court Rule of Civil Procedure 73.

Subsection (a)(3) of the rule was amended to allow a finding of implied consent to a magistrate judge whenever a party fails to file an answer, if an answer is required, or a party fails otherwise to appear in an action. The revision also allows a party whose consent to a magistrate judge has been inferred to withdraw the consent on a finding of good cause.

Subsection (a)(4) was amended to clarify the process for withdrawing express consent to a magistrate judge and to delete the process for vacating a referral to a magistrate judge, a process that is not applicable in Superior Court. Additionally, new subsection (a)(5) clarifies that a party’s express or implied consent to a magistrate judge does not foreclose the party’s ability to make a timely jury demand or the court’s ability to grant a request for a jury trial.

The amendments take effect immediately.

Recent News

Call for Comments

June 25, 2025

Comment on Proposed Changes to D.C. Rules Pertaining to Nonlawyer Owners in a Firm

The District of Columbia Bar’s Innovations in Legal Practice Committee (ILPC) is seeking comments on proposed amendments to D.C. Rule of Professional Conduct 5.4(b) and its Comments. The proposed revisions would allow D.C. Bar lawyers to cooperate and share fees with nonlawyers in a firm where its “principal” rather than “sole” purpose is the provision of legal services to clients, and where any other services provided by the firm are law-related services.

Skyline