• Print Page

Legal Ethics Committee Adopts New Opinions

February 24, 2021

The D.C. Bar Legal Ethics Committee has issued Opinion 380 (Conflict of Interest Issues Related to Witnesses), which examines certain recurring conflict of interest scenarios related to witnesses who are current or former clients, including issuing subpoenas, advising on Fifth Amendment rights, and cross-examination. The opinion also discusses thrust-upon conflicts involving unforeseen witnesses and the imputation of conflicts across a firm. Finally, the opinion offers suggestions for anticipating, identifying, preventing, and resolving conflicts related to witnesses. 

The committee has also issued Legal Ethics Opinion 381 (Responding to Third-Party Subpoena), addressing the circumstances under which a lawyer’s representation of a prospective client in responding to a third-party subpoena about the lawyer’s existing client or former client creates a conflict of interest under Rules 1.7 or 1.9. 

Recent News

Judge and gavel

March 30, 2026

Comment on Reappointment of Judges Easterly, Ruiz, Smith, and Weisberg

The D.C. Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure invites comments on the qualifications and fitness of D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Catharine F. Easterly, who is applying for reappointment as associate judge; Court of Appeals Judge Vanessa Ruiz, who is seeking reappointment as senior judge; and D.C. Superior Court Judges Judith A. Smith and Frederick H. Weisberg, who are requesting reappointment as senior judges.

This site uses essential cookies that include tracking technologies to assist with navigation and your ability to provide feedback, analyze your use of our products and services, assist with our promotional and marketing efforts, and provide content from third parties. View Privacy Policy

Accept
Skyline