• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Experts Discuss Cases to Watch as Supreme Court Begins New Term
  • Print Page

Experts Discuss Cases to Watch as Supreme Court Begins New Term

October 08, 2019

By Jeffery Leon

On September 25 the D.C. Bar CLE Program explored the key issues and cases that will be before the U.S. Supreme Court, which kicked off its new term Monday.

“Supreme Court Review and Preview 2019,” a popular annual presentation of the CLE Program, featured experienced Supreme Court practitioners John P. Elwood of Arnold & Porter LLP; Sarah Harrington of Goldstein & Russell, P.C.; and Deanne E. Maynard of Morrison & Foerster LLP. The program was moderated by Edith Roberts of SCOTUSblog.

The panel looked at the top decisions that came out of the Supreme Court in the previous term, including Rucho v. Common Cause on partisan gerrymandering; Department of Commerce v. New York on the Trump administration’s effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census; and Flowers v. Mississippi, which overturned the conviction of Curtis Flowers, an African American man who was tried six times for a quadruple murder following the prosecutor’s intentional removal of qualified black jurors from the jury pool.

On the issue of gerrymandering, Maynard highlighted state efforts to reduce political bias, including setting up independent commissions to draw district lines. Harrington, on the other hand, noted Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent in Rucho, with a possible motivation to “turn up the heat” on her colleagues and call attention to the Court’s actions.

In the census case, the Court found that the Trump administration is allowed to add the citizenship question, but it must provide an honest reason, Harrington said. She pointed out that the Court’s decision emerged weeks after files on the hard drives of deceased Republican strategist Thomas B. Hofeller were discovered, revealing that the intent around the citizenship question was to bolster results for Republicans.

The panel cited at least two big cases to watch during the new Supreme Court session: Kelly v. United States, the “Bridgegate” case where state public officials allegedly conspired to reduce traffic lanes on the George Washington Bridge to create major traffic jams in Fort Lee, New Jersey, after its mayor refused to endorse Chris Christie for reelection as governor, and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, focusing on employment discrimination based on gender identity.

Recent News

D.C. Bar Annual Awards

April 01, 2026

D.C. Bar Announces 2026 Award Winners

By Susannah Buell

The D.C. Bar has selected the winners of its 2026 Annual Awards honoring individuals and organizations whose outstanding work and exceptional projects benefited Bar membership, enriched the legal community, and expanded access to justice.

D.C. Court of Appeals

April 01, 2026

JNC Recommends Candidates for Court of Appeals Vacancies

The D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission has recommended to the president of the United States six candidates for judicial vacancies on the D.C. Court of Appeals in light of the retirement of Judge Kathryn A. Oberly and the resignation of Judge Loren L. AliKhan.

Judge and gavel

March 30, 2026

Comment on Reappointment of Judges Easterly, Ruiz, Smith, and Weisberg

The D.C. Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure invites comments on the qualifications and fitness of D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Catharine F. Easterly, who is applying for reappointment as associate judge; Court of Appeals Judge Vanessa Ruiz, who is seeking reappointment as senior judge; and D.C. Superior Court Judges Judith A. Smith and Frederick H. Weisberg, who are requesting reappointment as senior judges.

Skyline