• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • D.C. Superior Court Approves Multiple Rules Amendments
  • Print Page

D.C. Superior Court Approves Multiple Rules Amendments

November 21, 2022

On November 18 the Board of Judges of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued a series of promulgation orders approving amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure 5, 6, 37, and 43; Rule of Criminal Procedure 43; Juvenile Proceedings Rules 9 and 43; and Domestic Relations Rule 43.

In Promulgation Order 22-10, amendments to Rule 5(d) clarify that discovery materials must not be filed except in the circumstances specified in the rule. Revised Rule 6 now reflects that District of Columbia Emancipation Day and Juneteenth are legal holidays. Rule 37 subsections (c)(A)–(c)(D) have been corrected to redesignate them as subsections (c)(1)–(c)(4), respectively, to conform with the general restyling of the Superior Court rules. Changes to Rule 43(b) eliminate the requirement that a party seeking to present live testimony from a remote location establish “compelling circumstances.”
 
Promulgation Order 22-11 expands the court’s authority to permit a defendant to appear remotely. The amended Rule of Criminal Procedure 43 also clarifies when a defendant must be physically present, when a defendant may participate remotely, and when a proceeding may occur in a defendant’s absence.

In Promulgation Order 22-12, Juvenile Proceedings Rule 9 has been amended to authorize alternative methods of service if, upon motion, the court makes the appropriate determination. Revised Rule 43 expands the Superior Court’s authority to permit a respondent to appear by video or telephone conferencing.

Finally, Promulgation Order 22-13 states that amended Domestic Relations Rule 43 subsection (b) facilitates remote testimony by eliminating the requirement that a party seeking to present live testimony from a remote location establish “compelling circumstances.”

All of the amendments take effect immediately and govern all succeeding proceedings and insofar is just and practicable in all pending proceedings.

Recent News

D.C. Bar

January 23, 2026

Bar Seeks Candidates for Committee and Board Vacancies

The D.C. Bar Board of Governors is seeking candidates for appointment this spring to the Attorney/Client Arbitration Board (ACAB), Clients’ Security Fund, Legal Ethics Committee (LEC), Rules of Professional Conduct Review Committee, and Board on Professional Responsibility (BPR) of the D.C. Court of Appeals.

D.C. Court of Appeals

January 20, 2026

Comment on 12 Candidates for Court of Appeals Appointment

The D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission is inviting comments from the bench, bar, and public regarding the qualifications of 12 candidates for vacancies on the D.C. Court of Appeals created by the retirement of Judge Kathryn A. Oberly and the resignation of Judge Loren L. AliKhan.

Gerassimos Thomas

January 13, 2026

Tax Pros Outline Newest Developments in Global Tax Policy

By Jeff Leon

On January 5, two days before the D.C. Bar held its 10th annual Tax Conference, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) announced that 147 countries and jurisdictions have reached an agreement on several crucial provisions of a global minimum tax regime for multinational corporations.

Sean Clerget and Andrew Grossman

January 09, 2026

Capitol Hill Tax Counsel Weigh in on Issues to Watch in 2026

By Jeremy Conrad

The conventional wisdom that significant legislative action is unlikely in even-numbered years due to local and midterm elections was challenged by a bipartisan panel of speakers at the D.C. Bar’s 2026 Tax Conference on January 7.

Skyline