• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Board of Governors Addresses Questions on D.C. Bar’s Limitations to Issue Public Statements
  • Print Page

Board of Governors Addresses Questions on D.C. Bar’s Limitations to Issue Public Statements

June 17, 2020

Established in 1972 by the D.C. Court of Appeals for certain limited purposes and governed by the Rules of the Court, the District of Columbia Bar is a mandatory, integrated bar with more than 110,000 members. Our members are diverse in demographics, practice, thought, and political opinion.

The D.C. Bar Board of Governors is charged with conducting the affairs and activities of the Bar while respecting the diversity of its membership. In making any public statement, the Board of Governors must be mindful of, and adhere to, certain guidelines and limitations.

In a series of referenda approved by the membership in the 1970s and 1980s, the D.C. Bar was limited in its ability to: (1) engage in certain activities without the express approval of its members; and (2) fund certain activities using dues or license fees. These restrictions include a prohibition on making any public statement on matters related to legislation or amicus briefs unless expressly authorized by the membership itself.

Currently, the membership has authorized the D.C. Bar and Board of Governors to speak only on three matters: (1) the need to fill promptly judicial vacancies; (2) adequate court funding; and (3) public funding of legal services to ensure access to justice.

In considering any public statement, the Board of Governors also considers the First Amendment rights of its diverse membership. In Keller v. State Bar of California, the U.S. Supreme Court held that mandatory, integrated state bars could constitutionally fund activities that: (1) are germane to the regulation of the legal profession; or (2) improve the quality of legal services. Integrated bars could not, however, fund “activities of an ideological nature which fall outside of those areas.”

Since lawyers licensed to practice in the District of Columbia are required to be members of the D.C. Bar and pay annual license fees, the Board does not make public statements on political or public policy matters unless approved by the members and otherwise permitted under the Rules Governing the Bar and existing law.

Recent News

D.C. Bar Annual Awards

April 01, 2026

D.C. Bar Announces 2026 Award Winners

By Susannah Buell

The D.C. Bar has selected the winners of its 2026 Annual Awards honoring individuals and organizations whose outstanding work and exceptional projects benefited Bar membership, enriched the legal community, and expanded access to justice.

D.C. Court of Appeals

April 01, 2026

JNC Recommends Candidates for Court of Appeals Vacancies

The D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission has recommended to the president of the United States six candidates for judicial vacancies on the D.C. Court of Appeals in light of the retirement of Judge Kathryn A. Oberly and the resignation of Judge Loren L. AliKhan.

Judge and gavel

March 30, 2026

Comment on Reappointment of Judges Easterly, Ruiz, Smith, and Weisberg

The D.C. Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure invites comments on the qualifications and fitness of D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Catharine F. Easterly, who is applying for reappointment as associate judge; Court of Appeals Judge Vanessa Ruiz, who is seeking reappointment as senior judge; and D.C. Superior Court Judges Judith A. Smith and Frederick H. Weisberg, who are requesting reappointment as senior judges.

Skyline