- For the Public
- For Lawyers
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- Disciplinary Decisions
-
Attorney Discipline News
- Administrative Order 2026-2: Request for Comments on Proposed Board Rule Amendments
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals Appointments Board Members for 2026 Board Term
- Administrative Order 2026-1: Amendments to Board Forms 7.6, 7.6A and 11.13
- Guidelines for Hybrid Disciplinary Proceedings
- Administrative Order 2023-1: Return to In-Person Proceedings
- Administrative Order 2020-8: Live Streams of Hearing Committee Proceedings
- Administrative Order 2020-6: Guidelines for Remote Disciplinary Proceedings
- Policy on Scheduling Hearing Committee Matters
- Disciplinary Decisions are Available on Fastcase
- Volunteer Opportunities
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Attorney Name
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Date Range
Search Disciplinary Decisions by
Keyword
John Davis
Docket No. 2012-D153, 2014-D106 & 2014-D383
Decisions
Informal Admonition (October 21, 2015)
Summary: Bar Counsel issued Davis an informal admonition. While representing clients in three independent matters, Davis violated multiple Rules of Professional Conduct. Specifically, while representing a client in her efforts to resolve her unfavorable employment situation, Davis failed to explain the matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation and failed to put the basis or rate of the fee in writing. Rules 1.4(b) and 1.5(b). While representing a client in a District of Columbia Superior Court civil case, Davis failed to provide competent representation, failed to represent the client with diligence and zeal, and engaged in conduct that seriously interfered with the administration of justice. Rules 1.1(a), 1.1(b), 1.3(a), 1.3(c), and 8.4(d). While representing a client in multiple matters against his employer intermittently from 2009 through early 2015, Davis failed to represent the client with diligence and zeal and failed to explain the matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. Rules 1.3(a), 1.3(c), and 1.4(b).
To search for additional disciplinary cases involving this attorney, click here
- For the Public
- For Lawyers
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- Disciplinary Decisions
-
Attorney Discipline News
- Administrative Order 2026-2: Request for Comments on Proposed Board Rule Amendments
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals Appointments Board Members for 2026 Board Term
- Administrative Order 2026-1: Amendments to Board Forms 7.6, 7.6A and 11.13
- Guidelines for Hybrid Disciplinary Proceedings
- Administrative Order 2023-1: Return to In-Person Proceedings
- Administrative Order 2020-8: Live Streams of Hearing Committee Proceedings
- Administrative Order 2020-6: Guidelines for Remote Disciplinary Proceedings
- Policy on Scheduling Hearing Committee Matters
- Disciplinary Decisions are Available on Fastcase
- Volunteer Opportunities
- Board on Professional Responsibility
- 430 E Street NW
- Suite 138
- Washington, DC 20001
- Phone: 202-638-4290
- Fax:
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- 515 5th Street, NW
- Building A, Suite 117, Washington, DC 20001
- Phone: 202-638-1501
- Fax: 202-638-0862