• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Board of Governors Addresses Questions on D.C. Bar’s Limitations to Issue Public Statements
  • Print Page

Board of Governors Addresses Questions on D.C. Bar’s Limitations to Issue Public Statements

June 17, 2020

Established in 1972 by the D.C. Court of Appeals for certain limited purposes and governed by the Rules of the Court, the District of Columbia Bar is a mandatory, integrated bar with more than 110,000 members. Our members are diverse in demographics, practice, thought, and political opinion.

The D.C. Bar Board of Governors is charged with conducting the affairs and activities of the Bar while respecting the diversity of its membership. In making any public statement, the Board of Governors must be mindful of, and adhere to, certain guidelines and limitations.

In a series of referenda approved by the membership in the 1970s and 1980s, the D.C. Bar was limited in its ability to: (1) engage in certain activities without the express approval of its members; and (2) fund certain activities using dues or license fees. These restrictions include a prohibition on making any public statement on matters related to legislation or amicus briefs unless expressly authorized by the membership itself.

Currently, the membership has authorized the D.C. Bar and Board of Governors to speak only on three matters: (1) the need to fill promptly judicial vacancies; (2) adequate court funding; and (3) public funding of legal services to ensure access to justice.

In considering any public statement, the Board of Governors also considers the First Amendment rights of its diverse membership. In Keller v. State Bar of California, the U.S. Supreme Court held that mandatory, integrated state bars could constitutionally fund activities that: (1) are germane to the regulation of the legal profession; or (2) improve the quality of legal services. Integrated bars could not, however, fund “activities of an ideological nature which fall outside of those areas.”

Since lawyers licensed to practice in the District of Columbia are required to be members of the D.C. Bar and pay annual license fees, the Board does not make public statements on political or public policy matters unless approved by the members and otherwise permitted under the Rules Governing the Bar and existing law.

Recent News

Shaun Snyder

May 05, 2025

Candidates Pitch Vision for the Bar at Member Reception

By Jeremy Conrad

On May 1 D.C. Bar President Shaun Snyder addressed more than 100 members at a reception and lauded many of the Bar’s programs, services, and leadership opportunities, emphasizing the value of relationships he has forged through his involvement with the Bar.

D.C. Superior Court Chief Judge Milton C. Lee Jr.

April 30, 2025

AI and the Courts: Conference Highlights Dangers of New Tech

By Jeremy Conrad

Discussions at the 2025 Judicial & Bar Conference on April 25 reflected on the impact of technological changes on the legal profession, but several panelists also drew attention to the potential harm of artificial intelligence on the orderly administration of justice.

2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

April 30, 2025

D.C. Courts Release 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

Chief Judge Anna Blackburne-Rigsby of the D.C. Court of Appeals and Chief Judge Milton C. Lee, Jr., of the D.C. Superior Court have released the 14th annual Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, recognizing the contributions of those D.C. Bar members and other lawyers authorized to perform pro bono legal work in the District of Columbia who completed 50 hours or more of pro bono service during the prior calendar year.

Skyline