• You are here:
  • News & Events
  • News
  • Legal Ethics Committee Adopts Opinion 379 on Charging Liens
  • Print Page

Legal Ethics Committee Adopts Opinion 379 on Charging Liens

December 09, 2020

The D.C. Bar Legal Ethics Committee has issued Opinion 379 (Attorneys’ Charging Liens and Client Confidentiality), providing guidance in contingency fee matters on a predecessor lawyer’s ability to ethically provide notice of a charging lien to successor counsel. 

The opinion analyzes the ethical mandates surrounding a predecessor lawyer’s ability to use or reveal Rule 1.6 confidences or secrets in providing such notice to a successor lawyer, or, in accordance with Rule 1.8(i), to retain any part of a former client’s file. The opinion also discusses a successor counsel’s ethical duties under Rules 1.5 and 1.15 to (1) alert a client that their former lawyer may claim or be due a fee out of any potential recovery, and (2) safeguard funds that come into a successor counsel’s possession to which a predecessor counsel has a just claim and about which the successor lawyer is aware.   

Recent News

Gavel

September 11, 2024

Comment on Candidates for Superior Court Appointment

The D.C. Judicial Nomination Commission is inviting comments from the bench, bar, and public regarding the qualifications of nine candidates for the pending vacancy on D.C. Superior Court created by the retirement of Judge Anita Josey-Herring.

D.C. Superior Court

September 09, 2024

Superior Court Order Allows CJCC to Access Juvenile Records

On September 6 the Superior Court of the District of Columbia issued Administrative Order 24-12 authorizing the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (CJCC) to inspect, compile, and analyze data on criminal justice and juvenile justice systems so it can regularly publish aggregate data pursuant to DC Law 25-175.

Skyline