DC Bar: For Lawyers graphic
HomeHomeFind a MemberSite Map
graphic
Loading
 



For Lawyers
For the Public
Inside the Bar
Fastcase

Shopping cart

ABA Retirement Funds for your firm's 401(k)
 
Public Statement of the Litigation Section of the District of Columbia Bar Opposing the Mayor’s Recommendation to Cut $1 Million in Civil Legal Services and Loan Forgiveness Funding

Note: The views expressed herein represent only those of the Litigation Section of the District of Columbia Bar and its cosponsoring Sections. The views expressed are not those of the D.C. Bar or of its Board of Governors.

On April 13, 2010, the steering committee of the Litigation Section of the District of Columbia Bar voted, without dissent and with two recusals, to issue the following Public Statement, on behalf of the section, opposing District of Columbia Mayor Adrian M. Fenty’s recommendation to cut more than $1 million for fiscal year 2011 for civil legal services for low-income people and loan forgiveness for legal services lawyers.[1]

This statement is joined by the Administrative Law and Agency Practice; Antitrust and Consumer Law, Corporation, Finance and Securities; Courts Lawyers and the Administration of Justice; Criminal Law and Individual Rights; Family Law; Government Contracts and Litigation, Health Law; Labor and Employment Law; and Tort Law Sections of the D.C. Bar.



On April 1, 2010, Mayor Fenty released his proposed budget for fiscal year 2011, which cuts funding for the Access to Justice Program to $1.8 million, from $2.86 million in fiscal year 2010 and from $3.6 million in fiscal year 2009. The Access to Justice Program provides legal services for indigent D.C. residents, a community legal interpreter bank, and a loan repayment assistance program for lawyers serving people living in poverty.

This proposed cut would have far-reaching negative effects for the legal services community and for the indigent individuals it serves. The proposed cuts come at a time when unemployment and foreclosures in the District are reaching historic levels and options for legal services support have shrunk. Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts (“IOLTA”) funding fell by nearly 60% in 2009.[2]

According to a joint report of the D.C. Access to Justice Commission and the D.C. Consortium of Legal Services Providers, Rationing Justice: the Effect of the Recession on Access to Justice in the District of Columbia, the D.C. legal services network lost $4.5 million – or more than 25% of its total funding – in 2009 alone.[3] This loss of funding has already led to the loss of 12% of legal staff and nearly 40% of non-legal staff. The 2009 funding losses translate into a thousand fewer cases being handled before a court or administrative agency and over two thousand fewer clients receiving counseling, advice or brief services. The Mayor’s FY2011 proposed cuts, combined with the FY2010 cuts, would result in the loss of 18-20 additional legal services lawyers.

In addition to assisting District residents in dire need, legal services save the District money. Studies from other jurisdictions found that for every dollar spent on legal assistance, the government saves between $4 and $7. The following are a few examples of why this is the case:

  • Access to counsel in domestic violence cases improves safety. As a result, domestic violence survivors are less likely to be victimized, saving costs for public safety, medical treatment, job loss, and interruption of education for minor children in the home.
  • Preventing avoidable evictions reduces homelessness, shelter and other costs.
  • Legal Services providers often assist children who are receiving medical treatment through the Alliance (a 100% DC funded program) enroll in Medicaid (a 70% federally funded program). Each time someone switches from the Alliance to Medicaid, the District saves money.

Accordingly, the Litigation Section urges the D.C. Council to reject the Mayor’s recommendation to cut funding for civil legal services and loan forgiveness programs.


[1] Members of the Steering Committee of the Litigation Section of the D.C. Bar are: Theresa A. Coetzee, David D. Fauvre, Charles C. Lemley, Joshua A. Levy, Lucy Newton, David T. Ralston, Mary L. Smith, Bruce V. Spiva, and Moxila A. Upadhyaya. Lucy Newton and Mary L. Smith recused themselves from the vote on this matter.

[2] Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, Government of the District of Columbia 2011 Proposed Budget and Financial Plan, at A-187.

FY 2011 Proposed Budget and Financial Plan
This is a 571–page, 10.5 MB PDF document
Click to download Acrobat Reader Download and save now

[3] District of Columbia Access to Justice Commission and the D.C. Consortium of Legal Services Providers, Rationing Justice: The Effect of the Recession on Access to Justice in the District of Columbia

Back to text

graphic graphic  
Scorpion Design Professional Legal Web Design and Marketing
The District of Columbia Bar | 1101 K Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington DC 20005 | 202-737-4700 | Hours/Directions/Parking
©2013 D.C. Bar Restrictions on Use All rights reserved. Mobile site | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Policy | Disclaimer | Author guidelines