|
Speaking of Ethics Columns
The following is a list of columns the Legal Ethics Program periodically
contributes to the Washington Lawyer, the official magazine of
the D.C. Bar.
- Exit Strategy, May 2013
- When Does the Client Get to Call the Shots?, March 2013
- Lawyer vs. Client: The Problem With Keeping Secrets, January 2013
- On File, November 2012
- E–Discovery Vendors and Nonlawyer Partners, September 2012
- Can We Talk?, May 2012
- Considering ‘Of Counsel,’ January 2012
- To Report or Not to Report: That Is the Question, November 2011
- Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat, September 2011
- When Tarasoff Meets Rule 1.6, May 2011
- The Electronic Client File: Distinction Without a Difference?, March 2011
- Going Through ‘Withdrawal’, January 2011
- Helping the Indigent Client: A Threat to Lawyer Independence?, November 2010
- An E–Mance–ipation Proclamation, September 2010
- Representing
Clients With Diminished Capacity, May 2010
- In
Trust Accounts We Trust, March 2010
- Groundbreaking
Rules or Breaking Ground Rules, January 2010
- The
Client Perjury Problem, November 2009
- Lawyer
Bankruptcy and Client Money, September 2009
- Suing
Your Client: The Rule 1.6 Problem, May 2009
- Changing
Jobs, March 2009
-
Obedience, January 2009
- R
U Competent ?, November 2008
- When
Lawyers Lobby, September 2008
- How
Substantial Is Your Relationship?, May 2008
- The
Third Man, March 2008
- Pro
Bono Publico, January 2008
- Metadata
as Metaphor: A Major or Miner Matter?, November 2007
- Threatening
to Report a Crime That Has Not Yet Been Committed: An Ethical Violation?,
September 2007
- Law–Related
Services, May 2007
- Fee
Agreements and New Rules, March 2007
- When
a Lawyer Is a Guardian, January 2007
- Settling
Matters, November 2006
- Ex
Parte Contact With Former and Current Employees, September 2006
- D.C.
Conflict-of-Interest Rules and Opinions, June 2006
- Lawyer’s
Obligations When a Property Dispute Arises, May 2006
- Agreement
Between Lawyer and Media Representatives, April 2006
- Confidentiality
Revisited, March 2006
- Surrendering
Client Files Upon Termination of Representation, February 2006
- Contact
With In-House Counsel, January 2006
- May
a Solo Practitioner Be a Firm? December 2005
- Government
Lawyers and Rule 1.11, November 2005
- When
to File a Disciplinary Complaint, October 2005
- Fee
Sharing With Nonlawyers, September 2005
- Proposed
Changes to the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, August 2005
- When
a Lawyer Needs a Lawyer, June 2005
- Joint
Representation and Confidentiality, May 2005
- Should
You Refer an Attorney to Your Client’s Adversary? April 2005
- Firm
Mergers, Lawyer Departures, and Rule 5.6., March 2005
- Who
Is Your Client? February 2005
- Disposal
of Client’s Property, January 2005
- Qui
Tam Relators’ Counsel and Rule 4.2(b), December 2004
- Opinion
324: Disclosure of Deceased Client’s Files, June 2004
- Opinion
323: Misrepresentation by an Attorney Employed by a Government Agency
as Part of Official Duties, May 2004
- Opinion
322: Whether a Nonlawyer Employed by a Law Firm May Be Partly Compensated
by a Percentage of the Profits of the Cases on Which He Works, April
2004
- Opinion
286: Contingent Referral Fees, March 2004
- Of
Counsel: Opinions 151, 224, 277, 192, and 255, February 2004
- Opinion
292: Conflict of Interest: “Thrust Upon” Conflict, January
2004
- Opinion
265: Positional Conflicts of Interest in Simultaneous Representation
of Clients Whose Positions on Matters of Law Conflict With Other Clients’
Positions on Those Issues in Unrelated Matters, December 2003
- Opinion
296: Joint Representation: Confidentiality of Information, November
2003
- Lawyer’s
responsibilities to “nonprofit organizations”: Opinions
305, 269, 273, 312, 315, and 308, October 2003
- Opinion
321: Communications Between Domestic Violence Petitioner and Counsel
for Respondent in a Privately Litigated Proceeding for Criminal Contempt,
September 2003
- Opinion
320: Jury Nullification Arguments by Criminal Defense Counsel, August
2003
- Interest
on Lawyers’ Trust Accounts, June 2003
- Opinion
319: Purchase by a Lawyer of a Legal Claim From a Nonlawyer, May 2003
- Opinion
318: Disclosure of Privileged Material by Third Party, April 2003
- Opinion
315: Personal and Substantial Participation in Prior Litigation, March
2003
- Opinion
315: Personal and Substantial Participation in Prior Litigation, February
2003
- Chat
Room Communications, January 2003
- Opinion
314: Whether a Nonlawyer Union Employee May Supervise a Union Attorney,
December 2002
- Opinion
313: Whether a Lawyer May Continue to Represent a Client When That Lawyer
Represented the Same Client in the Same Matter While Serving as a Public
Officer or Employee, November 2002
- Conflicts
of Interest: Case in Point, October 2002
- Opinion
312: Information That May Be Appropriately Provided to Check Conflicts
When a Lawyer Seeks to Join a New Firm, September 2002
- The
Client’s File II: Rule 1.15(Safekeeping Property) and 1.16 (Declining
or Terminating Representation), also Opinions 283, 206 and 168, August
2002
- The
Client’s File: Opinion 250, 230 and 168, June 2002
- Opinion
306: Practicing Law While Simultaneously Selling Insurance, May 2002
- Clients
Freedom to Select Counsel: Rule 5.6 (Restrictions on the Right to Practice),
Opinions 181, 221, 65, 241, and 292, April 2002
- Opinion
273: Ethical Considerations of Lawyers Moving From One Private Law Firm
to Another, March 2002
- Opinion
305: Ethical Considerations Arising From Representation of Trade Association,
February 2002
- Opinion
309: Advance Waivers of Conflicts of Interest, January 2002
- Opinion
310: Propriety of Lawyer Charging Interest When the Client Fails to
Pay Fees, December 2001
- Representation
of Impaired Clients, November 2001
- From
Private Practice to Government Counsel, October 2001
- Fee
Sharing With the Feds? September 2001
- Unaffiliated
Lawyers Sharing Office Space and Services, August 2001
- Adventures
in Cyberspace, May 2001
- A
Primer on Confidentiality, Part 2, March 2001
- A
Primer on Confidentiality, Part 1, January 2001
- Collection
Agencies and Stocks in Kind, November 2000
- Reintroducing
the Legal Ethics Committee, September 2000
|