Rule 1.1Competence
(a) A lawyer shall provide competent representation
to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill,
thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
(b) A lawyer shall serve a client with skill and care
commensurate with that generally afforded to clients by other lawyers
in similar matters.
Comment
Legal Knowledge and Skill
[1] In determining whether a lawyer employs the requisite
knowledge and skill in a particular matter, relevant factors include the
relative complexity and specialized nature of the matter, the lawyer’s
general experience, the lawyer’s training and experience in the field
in question, the preparation and study the lawyer is able to give the matter,
and whether it is feasible to refer the matter to, or associate or consult
with, a lawyer of established competence in the field in question. In many
instances, the required proficiency is that of a general practitioner. Expertise
in a particular field of law may be required in some circumstances. One
such circumstance would be where the lawyer, by representations made to
the client, has led the client reasonably to expect a special level of expertise
in the matter undertaken by the lawyer.
[2] A lawyer need not necessarily have special training
or prior experience to handle legal problems of a type with which the lawyer
is unfamiliar. A newly admitted lawyer can be as competent as a practitioner
with long experience. Some important legal skills, such as the analysis
of precedent, the evaluation of evidence, and legal drafting, are required
in all legal problems. Perhaps the most fundamental legal skill consists
of determining what kind of legal problems a situation may involve, a skill
that necessarily transcends any particular specialized knowledge. A lawyer
can provide adequate representation in a wholly novel field through necessary
study. Competent representation can also be provided through the association
of a lawyer of established competence in the field in question.
[3] In an emergency a lawyer may give advice or assistance
in a matter in which the lawyer does not have the skill ordinarily required
where referral to or consultation or association with another lawyer would
be impractical. Even in an emergency, however, assistance should be limited
to that reasonably necessary in the circumstances, for ill-considered action
under emergency conditions can jeopardize the client’s interest.
[4] A lawyer may accept representation where the requisite
level of competence can be achieved by reasonable preparation. This applies
as well to a lawyer who is appointed as counsel for an unrepresented person.
See also Rule 6.2.
Thoroughness and Preparation
[5] Competent handling of a particular matter includes
inquiry into and analysis of the factual and legal elements of the problem,
and use of methods and procedures meeting the standards of competent practitioners.
It also includes adequate preparation and continuing attention to the
needs of the representation to assure that there is no neglect of such
needs. The required attention and preparation are determined in part by
what is at stake; major litigation and complex transactions ordinarily
require more elaborate treatment than matters of lesser consequence.
Maintaining Competence
[6] To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a
lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, and
engage in such continuing study and education as may be necessary to maintain
competence.
|