In the course of representing a client, a lawyer shall not knowingly:
(a) Make a false statement of material fact or law
to a third person; or
(b) Fail to disclose a material fact to a third person
when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent
act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited by Rule 1.6.
Comment
Misrepresentation
[1] A lawyer is required to be truthful when dealing
with others on a client’s behalf, but generally has no affirmative
duty to inform an opposing party of relevant facts. A misrepresentation
can occur if the lawyer incorporates or affirms a statement of another
person that the lawyer knows is false. Misrepresentations can also occur
by partially true but misleading statements or omissions that are the
equivalent of affirmative false statements. For dishonest conduct that
does not amount to a false statement or for misrepresentations by a
lawyer other than in the course of representing a client, see
Rule 8.4. The term “third person” as used in paragraphs
(a) and (b) refers to any person or entity other than the lawyer’s
client.
Statements of Fact
[2] This rule refers to material statements of fact.
Whether a particular statement should be regarded as material, and as
one of fact, can depend on the circumstances. Under generally accepted
conventions in negotiation, certain types of statements ordinarily are
not taken as statements of material fact. Estimates of price or value
placed on the subject of a transaction and a party’s intentions
as to an acceptable settlement of a claim are ordinarily in this category,
and so is the existence of an undisclosed principal except where nondisclosure
of the principal would constitute fraud. Lawyers should be mindful of
their obligations under applicable law to avoid criminal and tortious
misrepresentation. There may be other analogous situations.
Fraud by Client
[3] Under Rule 1.2(e), a lawyer is prohibited from
counseling or assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer knows is
criminal or fraudulent. Paragraph (b) states a specific application
of the principle set forth in Rule 1.2(e) and addresses the situation
where a client’s crime or fraud takes the form of a lie or misrepresentation.
Ordinarily, a lawyer can avoid assisting a client’s crime or fraud
by withdrawing from the representation. Sometimes it may be necessary
for the lawyer to give notice of the fact of withdrawal and to disaffirm
an opinion, document, affirmation or the like. In extreme cases, substantive
law may require a lawyer to disclose client information to avoid being
deemed to have assisted the client’s crime or fraud. If the lawyer
can avoid assisting a client’s crime or fraud only by disclosing
such client information, then under paragraph (b) the lawyer is required
to do so, unless the disclosure is prohibited by Rule 1.6. If, in the
particular circumstances in which the lawyer finds himself or herself,
the lawyer has discretion to disclose a client confidence or secret
under Rule 1.6(c), (d), or (e), disclosure is not prohibited by Rule
1.6, and the lawyer must disclose the information if otherwise required
by this rule.





