DC Bar: For Lawyers graphic
HomeHomeFind a MemberSite Map
graphic
Loading
 



For Lawyers
For the Public
Inside the Bar
Fastcase

Shopping cart

Vote Now in the D.C. Bar Elections!
 
9.9—Evidence of Unadjudicated Acts of Misconduct

  1. Notice to attorney. Evidence of unadjudicated acts of misconduct occurring prior to the Court’s order of disbarment or suspension with fitness ("unadjudicated acts") may be introduced by Bar Counsel at a hearing on reinstatement only if (1) Bar Counsel demonstrates that petitioner received notice, in Bar Counsel’s letter dismissing the complaint alleging the unadjudicated acts, that Bar Counsel reserved the right to present the facts and circumstances of the unadjudicated acts at a reinstatement hearing, and (2) Bar Counsel gives notice in the Answer to the petition for reinstatement that he intends to raise the unadjudicated acts at reinstatement.
  2. Admissibility of Unadjudicated Acts. Unadjudicated acts are admissible if supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Bar Counsel shall be required to make a written proffer of the evidence to support admissibility of unadjudicated acts to the Chair of the Hearing Committee considering the petition for reinstatement, and to serve a copy of the proffer upon the petitioner. Except for good cause shown, this proffer shall be filed no later than ten days before the date of the prehearing conference, conducted pursuant to Board Rule 9.6. The petitioner may file a response within five working days of the filing of Bar Counsel’s proffer. Unless the petitioner indicates in writing that he or she does not contest Bar Counsel’s proffer, the Chair shall determine whether Bar Counsel has met his burden of establishing the misconduct or may require the submission of proofs. The Chair, in his or her discretion, may also refer the matter to the full Hearing Committee for a determination.
  3. Review of Ruling Concerning Admissibility of Evidence of Unadjudicated Acts. The Hearing Committee shall include in its report to the Board the basis for the ruling concerning the admissibility of evidence of unadjudicated acts. The ruling is not subject to an interlocutory appeal but will be considered as part of the Board’s review of the Hearing Committee’s Report and Recommendation.
  4. Conduct Since Discipline was Imposed. The procedure for admissibility of unadjudicated acts set forth in this section shall not apply to evidence of conduct occurring after the Court’s entry of an order of disbarment or suspension with fitness, which would be admissible under In re Roundtree, 503 A.2d 1215 (D.C. 1985).

graphic graphic  
Join us as we honor those who fight for those who fight for the rights of people with HIV/AIDS
The District of Columbia Bar | 1101 K Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington DC 20005 | 202-737-4700 | Hours/Directions/Parking
©2013 D.C. Bar Restrictions on Use All rights reserved. Mobile site | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Policy | Disclaimer | Author guidelines